Suggested Topics :
The young actor’s emotional video and its aftermath has addressed the high-pressure reality behind stardom and the urgent need for empathy in the entertainment industry.
The brief but intense social media storm around actor Babil Khan this weekend serves as a sobering reminder of the emotional toll fame and public scrutiny often take on young artists navigating the high-pressure worlds of cinema.
On April 4, Khan, son of the late Irrfan Khan, posted an emotional video on his Instagram story, describing, in tears, Bollywood as “the fakest industry." He also named several celebrities, including Ananya Panday, Shanaya Kapoor, Siddhant Chaturvedi, Arjun Kapoor and Arijit Singh. The cryptic nature of the video led to rampant speculation about his mental health and prompted his temporary departure from Instagram.
But by Sunday evening, his family issued a clarification, stating that the video had been “extremely misinterpreted” and that the actor was simply having a difficult day.
The next day, he returned to social media and reiterated his stance — that he intended to express support for peers he admires, not to indict the industry or cause concern.
“I genuinely don’t have the energy to indulge more but I do this as responsibility for my peers that I truly admire,” he wrote in a statement. His gesture prompted an outpouring of solidarity, especially from the actors he mentioned in the video. Ananya Panday shared a message of love and support, while Siddhant Chaturvedi posted throwback videos with the actor and criticised the media for unnecessarily sensationalising the issue.
However, the incident took a darker turn when filmmaker Sai Rajesh, who was set to collaborate with Khan on the Hindi remake of his Telugu film Baby, posted a now-deleted story accusing the actor and his team of emotional manipulation. In a strongly worded response, Khan accused Rajesh of having subjected him to immense physical and emotional distress during the film’s preparation. He alleged undergoing extreme method acting experiences — from living in poor conditions to harming himself physically — to meet the filmmaker’s vision.
Despite their differences, the public nature of the fallout perhaps underscores a larger problem in the industry: the absence of safe spaces and protocols to address emotional labour, mental health and communication breakdowns in a respectful, private manner.