'Manushi' Dispute: Madras HC Judge to Watch Vetrimaaran-Backed Film Before Ruling on CBFC’s 37 Cuts

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh will hold a private screening on August 24 to decide if the CBFC’s 37 mandated cuts for Gopi Nainar’s custodial torture drama are justified.

Team THR India
By Team THR India
LAST UPDATED: AUG 21, 2025, 15:35 IST|5 min read
'Manushi' is produced under Vetri Maaran’s Grassroot Film Company
'Manushi' is produced under Vetri Maaran’s Grassroot Film Company

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court has decided to personally watch Manushi, the Andrea Jeremiah-starrer directed by Gopi Nainar, to determine whether the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) was justified in suggesting 37 cuts. The private screening will be held in Chennai on Sunday, August 24, The Hindu reported.

The decision came on Tuesday (August 19, 2025), during the hearing of a writ petition filed by the film’s producer, C. Vetri Maaran—an acclaimed director himself—who questioned the CBFC’s insistence on the extensive cuts before granting certification. Manushi has been produced under Maaran’s Grassroot Film Company.

You may also like

The film’s trailer, released in April 2024 by actor Vijay Sethupathi, indicated a hard-hitting narrative around custodial torture faced by a woman suspected to be a terrorist. In September 2024, however, both the CBFC’s examining and screening committees refused certification, stating the film portrayed the State in a poor light and blurred the line between “leftist communism” and “mainstream communism.”

Earlier Petition

In June 2025, Vetri Maaran had first approached the High Court after the CBFC issued a blanket rejection of the censor certificate. He argued that the decision was made without providing him an opportunity to be heard or disclosing the individual views of the committee members.

He also requested a re-examination by an expert panel including human rights activists. Justice Venkatesh, in that round of hearings, questioned the rationale of a blanket ban without specifying objectionable scenes or dialogues. On June 17, the judge disposed of the petition after recording the CBFC’s submission that it had reviewed the film again and identified objectionable portions.

You may also like

Current dispute

In the present petition, Maaran contends that the CBFC has gone beyond its mandate, flagging even minor dialogues such as the colloquial insult “saniyan” (used as a scolding term in Tamil).

Hearing the plea on Tuesday, Justice Venkatesh remarked that he would have to see the film himself, alongside the CBFC committee members, to assess whether the 37 suggested cuts were valid.

Latest News