Much has been of the scene from Vijay's 2024 release 

where he passes on a gun to Sivakarthikeyan in the film.

 became a huge pop-culture hit, prompting audiences to believe that Vijay — who is quitting films after #Thalapathy69 and entering politics full-time — has anointed Sivakarthikeyan as his successor in Tamil cinema.

Much to the delight of fans, in the film, Siva also replies to him, "Don't worry sir, you are going to take on a challenge much more pressing than this. You take care of that; I'll handle things here."

, Sivakarthikeyan addresses the response to his cameo in the film. "I did not interpret the scene as Vijay sir passing on the baton (of Kollywood cinema) to me at all. If I'd thought of it that way, I would have clarified it before shooting the scene itself!"

Read more | Heading South: The Cinema of The South Is Now The Cinema Of India

"I only look at it this way: This is Vijay sir sharing his love for me, appreciating the work I've done in my career so far, and encouraging me to keep at it. I'm incredibly grateful to him for that," he said.

Sivakarthikeyan added, "Vijay sir's three-decade journey in his career — the ups and downs, the victories and struggles — have created this immense legacy of his. That belongs to him and entirely him; I cannot replicate that. I have to create my own journey in films."

 star discuss his journey in films, the many challenges he has faced, his personal life and what's next for him in 2025, in the video interview dropping on 

a YouTube channel next Monday, January 6.

Read more | Amaran Movie Review: An Earnest Sivakarthikeyan, Stellar Battle Sequences, Middling Drama

Sivakarthikeyan interview: 'I cannot replicate Vijay sir's journey; I have to create my own'

 in conversation with Anushka Shah, founder of Civic Studios, for an evening that traced the emotional and cultural threads running through Chadha’s body of work. Speaking to a packed room, the 

. She reflected on how diasporic memory, identity, and the feeling of “carrying your parents with you” continue to shape her filmmaking. Chadha also revealed that her film’s contemporary Scrooge is inspired by a close friend from Uganda who arrived in the UK as a refugee — a reminder, she noted, of the lived histories that underlie her stories.

Gurinder Chadha on Diaspora and 'Christmas Karma' — and the Film Culture That Soho House Is Building in Mumbai

Saregama India Ltd, India’s oldest music label and a leading entertainment company, on Tuesday announced a strategic partnership anchored in a significant equity investment in filmmaker 

’s Bhansali Productions, scripting a new chapter in the Indian entertainment landscape. 

As part of this partnership, Bhansali Productions will exclusively sell all its future film music to Saregama, based on a pre-agreed formula. The structure guarantees Saregama a steady pipeline of premium, marquee film music, eliminating competitive bidding, thereby securing long-term market share in new music and controlling acquisition costs. Aligned with its evolving content strategy, Saregama will gradually streamline its in-house film production activities over the next 1–2 years, focusing instead on such strategic partnerships.

Commenting on the alliance, Avarna Jain, Vice Chairperson, Saregama India Ltd, said, “This partnership underscores Saregama’s strategy of aligning with India’s finest creative minds while delivering long-term value to shareholders. Bhansali Productions’ excellence in storytelling and content creation perfectly complements our leadership in music and entertainment.”

The partnership brings together Bhansali Productions’ distinctive and unmatched cinematic storytelling with Saregama’s leadership position in Music and Live Events, setting the foundation for a next-generation media and entertainment house.

Sanjay Leela Bhansali said he has found a trusted partner in Saregama for his visionary cinematic endeavours. 

“For me, powerful and meaningful cinema requires time, trust, and a deep respect for the process. In Saregama, we have found a partner that understands this philosophy. We share a deep respect for art, music, and story telling that is both grounded in tradition and resonates with audiences across generations,” Bhansali said. 

Bhansali Productions has a pipeline of over 10 feature films planned over the next three years. Their upcoming release 

, directed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali and starring Ranbir Kapoor, Alia Bhatt and Vicky Kaushal; and 

, a romantic drama directed by Ravi Udyawar, starring Siddhant Chaturvedi and Mrunal Thakur.

Saregama and Bhansali Productions Announce Strategic Partnership 

 guns for glory in the action-packed teaser for 

, a sequel to JP Dutta's beloved 1997 classic. Directed by Anurag Singh, the sequel highlights major engagements from the 1971 Indo-Pak War, spanning land, sea and sky-bound skirmishes. 

, Varun Dhawan and Ahan Shetty play the other bravehearts in what is described as a rousing tribute to the Indian armed forces. Amid guns, tanks and explosions, we get glimpses of the soldiers' personal lives, with Mona Singh, Sonam Bajwa, Anya Singh and Medha Rana playing their wives and lovers. 

Deol, as expected, looms over the enterprise, firing a rocket at enemy battalions and extolling the might of the Indian army. "Awaaz kaha tak jaani chahiye?" he thunders, to which the response comes, "Lahore tak." 

 was released on occasion of Vijay Diwas, which commemorates the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971. The film is slated to release on January 23, 2026. 

 aims to recreate the emotions and scale that made the original film a landmark. The story is expected to celebrate the heroism and unity of soldiers while adding a contemporary layer through new characters and perspectives. The film is produced by Bhushan Kumar, Krishan Kumar, J.P. Dutta and Nidhi Dutta under T-Series and J.P. Films.  Releasing ahead of the Republic Day weekend, it's is positioned as one of the biggest theatrical releases of 2026.

, was also a box-office sensation. He's the only returning actor from the original cast of 

. Incidentally, Ahan, who plays a Navy fighter in 

, is the son of Suniel Shetty, one of the leads of the 1997 film. 

The iconic song 'Sandese Aate Hai' has been recreated in

 with Sonu Nigam, Diljit Dosanjh, Vishal Mishra, and Arijit Singh reportedly lending their voices to the emotional track. 

'Border 2' Teaser: Sunny Deol Leads Varun Dhawan, Diljit Dosanjh and Ahan Shetty in Patriotic Sequel

 is now looking ahead. After the blockbuster opening of his spy actioner 

Ranveer is prepping to begin two tentpole movies, including a classic franchise and a zombie thriller.

The actor is now expected to begin filming 

, the film, which was announced two years ago. After numerous scheduling shifts, Farhan is believed to have locked the first half of 2026 when he plans to take the film on floors. 

 Ranveer's post-apocalyptic film, tentatively titled 

, will go on floors between July and August. The film will be helmed by director Jai Mehta, who had co-directed 

 with his filmmaker-father Hansal Mehta, and then made the show 

The report quoted a source, who stated that 

 will go on floors first in  2026, after that Ranveer will deep dive into 

will focus on building the post-apocalyptic zombie thriller world of the film, which reportedly follows the protagonist's fight for survival.

According to the report, Jai will "reimagine Mumbai in 

' style set-up" for the film, with the makers aiming to recreate a devastated Mumbai setting. "Large sections of the city will be digitally aged to give it an abandoned look. Parts of the film will be shot in Mumbai, before moving to other locations," the source was quoted as saying.

Ranveer, meanwhile, is basking in the glory of 

as the Aditya Dhar directorial is on a record-breaking run. The spy thriller minted a whopping ₹31.80 crore nett on its second Monday, setting the tone for a successful second week. In its first week, the film had collected ₹218.00 crore and then went on to record a second weekend of ₹146.60 crore. The 11-day total of the film stands at  ₹396.40 crore nett (India).

After 'Dhurandhar', Ranveer Singh Gears Up For 'Don 3' and Post-Apocalyptic Zombie Thriller 'Pralay': Reports

India’s Union ministry of information and broadcasting has denied screening permission to 19 films at the 2025 

International Film Festival of Kerala (IFFK)

, prompting criticism from festival organisers and filmmakers who describe the move as unprecedented in the event’s history.

The festival, underway in Thiruvananthapuram from December 12 to 19, was forced to cancel multiple screenings after exemptions were withheld for a group of films spanning continents, eras and political contexts. Among the titles affected were several Palestinian works, including 

, Sergei Eisenstein’s 1925 Soviet classic, widely regarded as foundational to modern film language and celebrated globally this year on its centenary.

Although films screened at festivals are not required to obtain censor certification, they must receive an exemption from the ministry. Organisers say that while individual films have faced objections in the past, this is the first time such a large number of films have been blocked simultaneously, throwing the programme into disarray.

Cuckoo Parameswaran, vice-chairperson of IFFK, told reporters that the decision had logistical and financial consequences for attendees. “187 movies were sent to the I&B ministry for exemption. We did not get approval yet for 19 movies. There are many people who took flight tickets and registered for IFFK to come here. This creates a lot of issues,” 

said, adding that nine screenings were cancelled on December 15 alone.

, Sandhya Suri’s internationally acclaimed film examining caste hierarchies, which premiered at Cannes and has yet to receive an Indian theatrical release. Suri is serving as a jury member at the festival this year. The Spanish film 

, which traces the life of a rising rap artist and bears no political connection to its title, was also among those denied permission.

 by Mauritanian filmmaker Abderrahmane Sissako, who is being honoured with a lifetime achievement award at this edition of IFFK, as well as films previously screened at the festival, such as 

Veteran filmmaker Adoor Gopalakrishnan criticised the decision, calling it an act of cultural illiteracy. “All these movies are very important movies in the history of cinema. If they say it cannot be screened then that is because of ignorance,” he told reporters. “

 can be considered a textbook to study cinema. The authorities should reconsider this decision.”

The ministry has not yet issued a public explanation for the refusals.

Centre Blocks 19 Films at Kerala Film Festival, Including Palestine Titles and Cinema Classic 'Battleship Potemkin'

was released on December 15, giving audiences a glimpse of the unpredictable, frenetic nature of the philosophical actioner. The film, co-starring 

, and Raj B Shetty, revolves around an event that changes all their lives. "There's a day you're born and the day you die. Life is just a dash in between these two dates," we're told in the voiceover, as the tightly cut trailer then shows us these three pivotal characters whose lives are intertwined. While Raj B. Shetty appears to play an innocent civilian caught in a chaotic circus, Shiva Rajkumar and Upendra's roles seem to have a touch of surrealism. 

The film is written and directed by Arjun Janya and will be out in theatres on December 25. 

Produced by Ramesh Reddy under the Suraj Productions banner, it features Satya Hegde as the cinematographer. Upendra was last seen in the 

, alongside Ram Pothineni, while Shiva Rajkumar was seen in 

 (2024). Raj B Shetty, on the other hand, comes fresh off the success of 

 in the wake of the film’s soaring success, Shetty opened up about the evolving landscape of Kannada cinema and the urgent need for homegrown films that the audience appreciates. “We need Kannada films that will pull people to the theatres,” he said, indicating that the industry hasn’t had the smoothest run this year.

He recalled the initial hesitation from distributors. “They told me clearly; don’t release it on the 25th, there are bigger films from other languages coming out. But I told them I’ll try. For me, the first week was a trial,” Shetty shared. “The first day we had 70 shows in Bangalore. Second day? 180. By the third day, we hit 340 shows. On Sunday, they started opening 6 PM shows because they just couldn’t accommodate any more demand. Now

 is one of the biggest films in Bengaluru.”

'45' Trailer: Shiva Rajkumar, Upendra, and Raj B Shetty In A Moralistic Action Drama

, being a parent to grown-up children comes with a particular kind of helplessness. Watching them stumble, he admits, is often harder than stepping in to fix things. “For parents, I think one of the hardest things is to watch your kids struggle. You want to say, ‘Forget it. I can fix this for you’,” he says. 

But over time, he has had to make peace with the fact that he can’t. “It’s been a process for me, understanding that I can’t fix everything. They need to have their own struggles and their own challenges.”

Asked how much he’s able to distance himself from 

 journeys, especially given how unforgiving the film industry can be, Khan is honest. “I can’t really distance myself,” he says. A line shared by a friend has stayed with him. “You can only be as happy as your least happy child,” he says. 

He speaks warmly about Sara’s life outside films, mentioning that she’s back at Columbia University and is currently in New York. “She’s in the library, she watched a good play yesterday. I’d love to encourage that side of life apart from the stress of movies.” Acting, he believes, should be approached as a craft, not a competition. “All too often, it becomes stressful and competitive,” he says, adding that it’s something he actively tries to guide his children away from.

With Ibrahim, Khan often talks about visibility. “I keep trying to say something about appearances,” he explains, noting how constant public exposure can dilute mystery. “It’s very old-school to say I should only see you on screen, but every time you go out, you’re recorded.” 

He also admits to something many parents quietly fear. “There’s this scary idea that it won’t be perfect for everyone. If every child has a good school, good college, good job, happy life, that would be a dream. But there might be some rocks in the road for some of them.”

Watch the full interview with Saif Ali Khan on our 

Saif Ali Khan on Parenting Sara and Ibrahim: 'You Can Only Be As Happy As Your Least Happy Child'

The beginning of the year was anything but easy for 

. A break-in at his home left the actor injured, placing him in a situation that could have permanently altered his life. Asked whether surviving a 

 fundamentally changed him as a person or an artist, Khan says, “No, not really. I think I’ve always been aware of some of these things.”

He draws a parallel to the questions he was asked during the pandemic. “People asked me during COVID, ‘Have you changed? Do you have a different outlook?’ And after this incident as well… no, not really. I can’t say I’ve had some kind of epiphany or that I now suddenly know what’s important,” he says.

What the experience did leave him with, however, is a sharper awareness of how close he came to lasting damage. “I feel incredibly lucky and blessed to have gotten away with it the way I did. It was very close,” he admits. The injury, he explains, narrowly missed his spinal cord. “There was a nick there, and that could have led to paralysis. I had lost feeling in my leg for a while.” That brief brush with immobility lingers. “The concept of being bedridden forever or being paralysed is frightening. It still frightens me,” he says.

Khan doesn’t frame the experience as a transformation, but as gratitude. “I’m appreciative that I’m healthy. That keeps me grateful,” he says, adding that the incident may have “accentuated it slightly” without revealing anything new to him. “I’ve always known every day is a blessing. I’ve always lived a certain way, knowing that it’s a privilege to even go through life the way we do.” 

Even ambition, he suggests, exists within that awareness. “My life itself, even though I have aspirations and sometimes fall short or achieve things, is still an incredible privilege. I’m massively lucky anyway,” he says.

With a smile, he adds, “I get the feeling that I have nine lives. Having said that, I might be gone tomorrow.”

Saif Ali Khan on Life After The Knife Attack: 'The Concept of Being Paralysed Still Frightens Me’

 has signed on to a new film that he admits he can’t fully talk about yet. “It’s a biopic and it’s Bengali, which is a bad clue because it sounds much more regional than it is. There will be a bit of a Bengali accent,” and adds that its something he’s looking forward to figuring out.

What excites him most isn’t the label, but the process. “I’m not doing anything for three months except figuring that out,” he says. For an actor who often juggles packed schedules, that kind of uninterrupted preparation feels rare. “I’m very excited to prep and really get into it. To understand why you’re saying what you’re saying. I just got the line, now I have to understand it,” he adds.

When asked about the last time he felt he truly put in that kind of work, he doesn’t single out a recent film. “I think I’ve worked hard on all of them. Whether it shows or whether it doesn’t,” he admits. Still, he admits that projects allowing deep preparation have been few and far between. “Maybe 

 was the last thing we prepped that way. That was a long time ago,” he says.

Over the years, Khan says his understanding of effort has shifted. “Sometimes I feel you can work too hard at the wrong thing,” he says. Long hours, travel, and exhaustion don’t always translate into meaningful work. “You spend ages, you bleed all your blood out, and it doesn’t go anywhere. It’s heartbreaking.”

What he values now is focus. “More concentrated work with sharp directors who don’t exhaust you. Nine to six, rock and roll, and you’ve done something amazing,” he says, That, for him, is real work. “You’ve sweated a bit, but it’s not wasted,” he adds.

Exclusive | Saif Ali Khan’s Next Is a Bengali-Rooted Biopic: ‘I’m Excited to Prep And Really Get Into It’

Move over superheroes and song-and-dance spectacles. In a refreshingly sinister turn, this year will perhaps be remembered as the year India swept its hair back, offered up her neck and said, “Fine, go on then — take a bite.”

Vampires have always been everywhere. But curiously, India has somehow remained a strangely reluctant host to bloodsuckers. We opened the door, peered out, shrugged and went back to watching family melodramas.

Sure, there were early attempts. In 1989, Bengal gave us 

, featuring Prosenjit Chatterjee and Moon Moon Sen, heavily reliant on earnest gazes and a very tired fog machine. A year later, the Ramsay Brothers graced us with 

, a B-grade sex-slave horror oddity where the vampire was named Nevla. Yes, mongoose. This one specialised in biting young women to spread his evil seed, because the Ramsays never met a metaphor they couldn’t make slightly uncomfortable.

And then… silence. Decades passed, during which Indian cinema flirted with the vampire myth the way filmy heroes flirt with heroines — lots of circling, very little commitment. A Malayalam film titled 

staggered onto screens in 2013. Bengal tried again with 

 in 2020. Then there was the Netflix show 

 in 2023, but none of these quite pierced the jugular of the zeitgeist. An awkward scratch rather than a seductive bite. India, it seemed, just didn’t have the neck for vampires.

 technically arrived last year, but its India release in early 2025 set the mood — a bit of German Expressionism and a lot of eyeliner. Then came 

, and overnight, the undead and the uncanny were once again coursing in the cultural bloodstream, strolling through trend pieces, and on X threads.

This is the moment when the Internet announces that vampire movies spike during recessions. Or that zombies flourish under Republican governments while vampires bloom under Democrats. These theories have charts. They have graphs. They have earnest young people explaining them in Reels. They are delightful and entirely useless when trying to understand why India, all at once, developed an appetite for the fang and the femme.

What is more helpful is to simply look at what has been happening on our screens. For the years since the Covid-19 pandemic, the theatrical space has been a sweaty, booming showcase of hypermasculinity. 

(all in 2023) showed that a certain kind of brawny cinema could flatten everything in its path. The trend picked up steam, and 

 followed in 2024. In that climate, anything stranger or led by women didn’t stand a chance — 

, for all its sleek action and ambition, was dead on arrival. 

Something shifted this year. A parallel movement slipped in. 

Rashmika Mandanna’s toothy theatrics in 

. Add to that Rukmini Vasanth’s occult charge in 

 — not a vampire film, but fluent in spell work — and suddenly you had a constellation of women who were more terrifying, more interesting, and more unapologetically feral than the bulky men on the marquee.

Squint at the rise of vampire films and you can almost see a cultural argument about who’s allowed to be monstrous now. As post-pandemic cinema doubled down on testosterone, the monstrous feminine crept in as aesthetic insurgency.

— but the scale is. These women refuse patriarchal legibility. They irritate, seduce, weaponise. The monster isn’t the point; the reclamation is. In 2025, monstrous women don’t soften. They stomp in, leave claw marks, and demand attention. Glorious.

Here’s taking a closer look at each one of them.

Apte’s Uma is the kind of woman your mother warned you about and your inner gremlin immediately roots for. 

 begins with the familiar tableau of an arranged marriage — nice girl, nice boy, nice suffocation — and twists it until something feral slithers out.

A tale about repressed sexuality, taboo longing, and all the desires we’ve spent decades training women to swallow politely. Uma simply wants to have sex with her husband; he doesn’t. Left alone, starved of connection, she becomes ripe for metamorphosis. The audience is invited to witness Uma’s hunger, her flesh-eating rebellion, and by the end, to become complicit in it.

 is technically a launching pad for a Malayalam superhero universe. The magic is in 

’s strange, shimmering presence as Chandra. This isn’t your run-of-the-mill “chosen one” plot. Dominic Arun (with co-writer Santhy Balachandran) fuses Kerala folklore with kickass action, giving Chandra a mythic energy that doesn’t become a cliché. Films of this scale often saddle their women with tragic-sacrifice arcs, but Chandra is power incarnate.

She is not here to prop up anyone else’s heroism. She’s flattening local goons in a parking lot fight that drains the testosterone out of the frame. Swathed in reds — hair, jacket, the electric glow that trails her — she becomes the film’s feminist antithesis to every mansplaining, posturing male around her. Chandra is part goddess, part avenger, part folklore. She’s the threat men never see coming until they’re on the floor.

is what happens when a big-budget mainstream entertainer flirts with vampire lore and then promptly fumbles it in favour of a mushy romantic arc. And yet, Mandanna as Tadaka does her best to sink her teeth into the role with wide-eyed abandon. The film itself has enough ideas to power three franchises but forgets to pursue any. Hidden inside its forest of cloaked vampires is a genuinely compelling conceit: vampirism as the short- hand for outsiders; the unwanted, the unseen, the communities pushed to the edges.

There’s an ambitious backstory too: these undead once tried to help humans, only to retreat after witnessing the brutality our species was capable of. Mandanna wraps Tadaka’s loneliness in her myth — an exile within an exiled people. Like Chandra and Uma, she strains against the limits of her world. The romance may be flimsy, but her choice still matters. Because this isn’t a B- grade horror sideshow; this is a Diwali-day mainstream release, a slot once reserved for the Khans. And here, at the centre of the spectacle, stands a woman reclaiming her agency, fangs and all. 

To read more exclusive stories from The Hollywood Reporter India's December 2025 print issue, pick up a copy of the magazine from your nearest book store or newspaper stand.

From 'Lokah' to 'Thamma,' Here's Why 2025 Was The Year of the Vampire On-Screen

Heterosexuals are really fraught. Their desires are mapped onto their gender privilege or lack thereof, so every act of penetrative sex can be framed as un-feminist, the man, literally, invading the woman, but because it is desire, and because the loins throb with a logic that the brain often cannot keep up with, this disjunction is left for the ‘political lesbians’ to debate and deal with. 

Writer-director Jeo Baby, who previously unmasked the gruelling and cumulative violence of heterosexual marriage in 

 and the tender dysfunction of queerness in a rabidly surveilled heterosexual world in 

, now wants to take a stab at open marriages. 

The problem is men, a man, really—Adarsh (Baby, himself), a graphic designer who works from home, fielding calls from clients, masturbating to his own erotic etchings. If as director Sanjay Leela Bhansali notes, the top shot is god’s view of the world, Baby’s god is a pervert. The first half of the film largely takes place through top shots of different beds in post coital hush. 

At first, Adarsh is masturbating. Then, Adarsh is in bed with a woman who, rambling and reluctant, brings up Maria (Divya Prabha), Adarsh’s wife. Maria knows about Adarsh’s affair, but the woman is unsure of how she will behave if they meet publicly. Adarsh swats her soft anxieties with his hard certainty. He seems to walk through the world knowing exactly what he wants—of himself, but as we grow to see, of others, too. 

The chronology is important here. Adarsh first pursued his affair. And then, he confronted his wife with it, opening up the marriage, because Adarsh, and perhaps, humans, but mostly men, and certainly this man is not made for monogamy. Maria concedes. Infidelity and open marriages are different, but here, the film tries to collapse these two. So far, so male. 

In the following scene, we see Maria in bed with Siddharth (Jitin Puthanchery), where his wife Farzana and his guilt is brought up. Farzana does not know about Siddharth’s affair. They have a child together, and their top shots are not post-coital, but with the child in between—this god is not a pervert, but a tender observer. 

The film turns on its head when Adarsh proposes a threesome with Maria and Siddharth. Maria, initially reluctant, agrees, but the image of his wife being eaten out by another man, not to mention Siddharth’s greater stamina, makes Adarsh spiral. The male instinct to thumb down competition kicks in. Siddharth’s exploits are not shown graphically or at all, framed through blurs or blocked foregrounds or brought up later in conversations—so many conversations, all sound and fury signifying nothing, to the point of verbal diarrhoea, the emotional riptide flattened out. The point is not Divya being pleasured; the point is Adarsh being ruined by this pleasure. Perhaps the top shot is the best visual language to give expression to this flat world, where there is no foreground—everything is distant, everything is background.

Obsessed with the aftermath of desire, the film forgets to stage desire itself, as though it is resolved. But it isn’t—to show the aftermath of desire, you must show what is at stake, the desire itself. The film wants to see Maria as a victim of Adarsh—literally, meaning principles—taking her side, without inhabiting her desire, because it is easier to apportion blame to him than to burn alongside her. Why does she stay with Adarsh after he cheats on her? Why is she drawn to him? 

I refuse to take a film seriously when it insists on how desire corrodes life, when it cannot or refuses to stage desire’s imbuing of life with pleasure, pleasure that upturns our received notions of self, dignity, and even desire. Desire is merely what is comprehended from conversations. 

turns desire into a man-ifesto, the way it turns feelings into words, because it is easier to poke at manifestos than fuller, realised lives. The film, though, breathes beautifully in the smaller details, the way Maria tries to retrieve a phone that is stuck between her and Adarsh as they are trying to cuddle, the small, charming idiosyncrasies of modern life; the way Adarsh keeps switching sides of the bed, unlike most people who prefer one side. 

Speak to anyone in open relationships and the one thing they will say is over-communicate. Every itch of the body needs to be accounted for, because it might grow into a scab that devours the body. In 

the over-communication is essentially Maria placating Adarsh—that she loves him, that he was the one who decided to open up the marriage, that then, she should not be held responsible for pursuing and feeling pleasure, and perhaps, (and this goes unsaid) greater pleasure from another man. These conversations, initially pointed, because recklessly repetitive, to a point of exhaustion. The circling around the same wound without really scrubbing it clean makes the film seem like it has run out of tricks. 

The running spine through the film is that our ideology never maps neatly into the practicalities of life. Heterosexual sex is precisely that—and it is an idea so banal, you wait for the film to toy with it, turning it around, and doing something besides merely stating it. 

Adarsh’s spiral, which is supposed to be the film’s clinching drama, is even visually manifested in a spiral staircase that Adarsh ascends in the climax—a juvenile metaphor, really, but a striking image—and becomes a series of petulant pouts. The film eventually flirting with the bizarre feels like a copout. If you have the courage to provoke, as a filmmaker, have the conviction to see it through.

Besides, the film is too short. Its runtime of over 70 minutes, includes the almost ten minute opening credits where everyone from the light boy to the focus puller to the apartment is credited. The lacking length is not a problem in and of itself, but it produces a grating sense that the film does not have much to say, except to state its provocation and scurry away, like a child ringing a bill, like a troll dropping a tweet, to recede into the dark, dark nothingness.

IFFK 2025 | 'Ebb' Movie Review: A Spectacular Misfire from Jeo Baby

, has reportedly wrapped up filming. The film's producer Vijay Moolan posted an update on Instagram, sharing pictures with the cast and crew of the film, including Madhavan, his wife Sarita, and Vinay. "

The film, directed by Krishnakumar Ramakumar, is aiming for a Summer 2026 release. 

, the much-anticipated biopic on visionary industrialist and inventor G.D. Naidu, R. Madhavan is seen in a striking transformation as Naidu. Often hailed as the “Edison of India” and “The Wealth Creator of Coimbatore,” G.D. Naidu’s groundbreaking contributions to science, technology, and public service left a mark on India’s industrial history. His enduring legacy continues to be celebrated — most notably with Tamil Nadu’s longest bridge bearing his name. The timing of the first look’s release on October 26 serves as a fitting homage to his pioneering spirit.

 marks the reunion of the National Award-winning teams behind 

, bringing together Varghese Moolan Pictures and Tricolour Films once again for another biopic. Madhavan will once again be seen portraying a real-life visionary. The film’s cast features an ensemble of actors, including Sathyaraj, Jayaram, Priyamani, Dushara Vijayan, Thambi Ramaiah, and Vinay Rai. Acclaimed composer Govind Vasantha will helm the historical drama's music.

Written and directed by Krishnakumar Ramakumar, 

 is being shot entirely in Coimbatore — Naidu’s birthplace — to authentically capture the textures and atmosphere of his era. The film is produced by Varghese Moolan and Vijay Moolan of Varghese Moolan Pictures, alongside R. Madhavan and Sarita Madhavan of Tricolour Films. Aravind Kamalanathan serves as Cinematographer and Creative Producer, with Muralidaran as Executive Producer. Madhavan was last seen in Hindi film 

, alongside Ranveer Singh and Akshaye Khanna

'GDN': R Madhavan's Biopic On GD Naidu Wraps Up Filming

Nearly a week after the verdict in the Kerala actor assault case, the actor at the centre of the proceedings has issued her first public statement, sharply criticising the conduct of the trial court and saying she had lost confidence in the process years before the judgment was delivered.

In a social media post, she said the verdict did not come as a surprise to her, describing it instead as the outcome of “years of pain, tears and emotional struggle”. “Not every citizen in this country is treated equally before the law,” she wrote, calling it a deeply painful realisation.

On December 8, the Principal District and Sessions Court in Ernakulam convicted six people for abducting and sexually assaulting the actor, while acquitting actor Dileep, who had been charged as the eighth accused and alleged to have masterminded the crime. The verdict was delivered by judge Honey M Varghese.

“This verdict may surprise many people, but it did not surprise me,” the actor wrote. She said she began to feel as early as 2020 that something was not right with the way the case was being handled. According to her, even the prosecution had flagged changes in the court’s approach, particularly in relation to one accused.

Although the case had initially been assigned to the current judge following a request for a woman judge, the years that followed, she said, were marked by what she described as hostility from the court towards both the prosecution and herself.

In a statement issued on December 14, she listed six reasons for losing faith in the trial court. Chief among them was the handling of key evidence. She said her fundamental rights were not protected, pointing to the memory card — described as the most crucial piece of evidence — being illegally accessed three times while it was in court custody. She also referred to the resignation of two public prosecutors from the case, both of whom, she said, cited a hostile court environment and concerns about bias. According to her, the prosecutors personally warned her not to expect justice from the court.

The actor said she repeatedly sought a proper investigation into the alleged tampering of the memory card but was not provided the investigation report until she pressed for it repeatedly. She added that her concerns deepened when the accused filed a petition requesting that the same judge continue to hear the case. She said she wrote to the President and the Prime Minister of India, outlining her concerns and seeking intervention. A request to conduct proceedings in open court, allowing the public and media to observe the hearings, was also denied, she said.

“Over the years, I approached the High Court and the Supreme Court multiple times, clearly stating that I did not trust this court,” she wrote. Every request to have the case moved away from the same judge was dismissed, she added.

Reflecting on the outcome, she said the verdict had reinforced her understanding of how strongly human judgement could shape decisions. At the same time, she noted that she did not believe all courts functioned in the same way.

She also used the statement to address what she described as false narratives circulating online about one of the convicted accused, clarifying that he was neither her employee nor someone she knew personally, and that she had met him only briefly years earlier during a film shoot. The statement concluded with a note of gratitude to those who stood by her, alongside a sharp response to continued online abuse, which she described as driven by paid narratives.

Kerala Actor’s First Post After Assault Case Verdict Questions Trial Court Process

After a list of superstar cameos and appearances, 

 is reportedly the latest to join the sets of 

, Balan is said to have been impressed with the script narrated to her. She is also said to be playing a character that is bold and charismatic. She was last seen in Ajith’s 

(2019) in Tamil. In Hindi, her last film was 

After initially announcing a release in June next year, the film appears to have pushed its new release date to August 14 of 2026, coinciding with the Independence Day Holiday weekend. Actors Mohanlal and Vinayakan are both said to appear in 

 is expected to join the film’s sets in Goa after December 20, in what is reportedly a short three-day stint. He played the role of Rajinikanth’s friend, a gangster named Mathew, in the film’s first part.

Similarly, actor Vinayakan, who played the dreaded bad guy Varman in the first film, said during a recent press event that he would feature in 

. It is unclear at the moment if he will be reprising the same character, in what perhaps might be a flashback portion (Varman dies during the climax of the first film).

 also featured much-hyped cameos by actors such as Shiva Rajkumar from Kannada cinema, Jackie Shroff from Hindi and Sunil from Telugu cinema. Meanwhile, 

has been re-released in theatres in a newly remastered 4K version, to mark the star's 

Subscribe

Subscribe

Subscribe

Sivakarthikeyan interview: 'I cannot replicate Vijay sir's journey; I have to create my own'

READ MORE ABOUT:

Latest News