‘Superman’ Kiss Censored in India, Sparks Backlash Over CBFC Guidelines

Two kiss scenes from James Gunn’s Superman were cut by India’s film board to secure a UA rating, reigniting debates over inconsistent censorship and outdated standards.
A still from 'Superman'
A still from 'Superman'
Updated on

James Gunn’s Superman has stirred unexpected controversy in India — not for its action or violence, but for a kiss.

India’s Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) removed two kiss scenes from the film, including a 33-second mid-air moment between Superman and Lois Lane, reportedly citing them as “overly sensual” to grant the film a UA (parental guidance for under-13) rating. The edits were made ahead of the film’s July 7 certification, according to local reports.

The decision has drawn sharp criticism from fans, filmmakers, and cultural commentators, who accuse the CBFC of applying conservative and inconsistent standards.

Actor Shreya Dhanwanthary (Scam 1992, The Family Man) voiced her frustration online, writing: “If this is true, this is RIDICULOUS!!! Some ridiculous crap happens every day. Every. Damn. Day.” Digital creator Amol Jamwal echoed the sentiment: “You can have lewd double meaning jokes in Housefull 5. Beheadings & gory violence in Jaat. But… Superman kissing Lois Lane is where we draw the line."

You may also like

You May Also Like
Union Minister Suresh Gopi’s ‘Janaki v/s State of Kerala’ Faces CBFC Challenge
A still from 'Superman'
You May Also Like
‘Kuberaa’ Starring Dhanush Recieves 19 Cuts from CBFC
A still from 'Superman'

Another X user pointed out the double standard: “CBFC would allow horrific scenes of violence and sexual assault in a U certified film… but won’t allow consensual kissing in a U/A comic book movie.”

You may also like

You May Also Like
'Superman' Box Office: Armed With Good Reviews, James Gunn-David Corenswet Feature Aims For ₹40 Crore Weekend
A still from 'Superman'
You May Also Like
‘Superman’ First Reactions: “A Terrific Start for the New DC Studios”
A still from 'Superman'

The controversy adds to a growing list of international films altered for Indian audiences. Earlier this year, F1 had a middle-finger emoji replaced with a fist, and Thunderbolts arrived with muted expletives. Critics argue that such censorship, though technically permitted under the Cinematograph Act, often undermines the intent and tone of global cinema.

The dissolution of the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal in 2021 has also left filmmakers with limited options. Without an industry-led appeal mechanism, disputes must go through India’s high courts — a lengthy and costly process, especially for international studios trying to maintain global release schedules.

The Hollywood Reporter India
www.hollywoodreporterindia.com